Letitia James Claimed “Insufficient Evidence.” Then Her Lawyers Revealed 115,000 Pages of It. In the span of nine days, Letitia James filed her motion to dismiss and four amicus briefs were filed in support, all making the same central claim: experienced career prosecutors reviewed the evidence against New York’s Attorney General and found it insufficient to prosecute. James’s own motion […]
Four amicus briefs filed in the past week all make the same claim: Career prosecutors found insufficient evidence, and Erik Siebert declined to prosecute Letitia James for mortgage fraud. That claim is provably false. Between February and June 2025, I published independent forensic investigations documenting 40 years of systematic financial fraud in verifiable public records: phantom mortgages that don’t exist
ABC News reported yesterday that U.S. Attorney Erik Siebert may be fired after declining to prosecute New York Attorney General Letitia James for mortgage fraud. According to their sources, despite a five-month investigation that found evidence, Siebert chose not to bring charges. Whether or not that reporting proves accurate, the evidence itself is overwhelming and deserves to be examined on
When America’s newspaper of record chooses narrative over evidence, someone has to set the record straight The New York Times wants you to believe that the federal investigation into Attorney General Letitia James is nothing more than Donald Trump’s revenge fantasy made manifest. In a June 11 article by Jonah E. Bromwich—his second puff piece defending James from federal prosecution—”She
How the NY Times Spins Letitia James Mortgage Fraud Investigation Read More »
Corruption, Crime, Media Playbook