Lindsey Halligan

Judge Currie Dismissed the Indictment—But Not Because the Evidence Was Weak

/ 12 minutes of reading

Abbe Lowell filed 50 pages attacking “fringe bloggers” and alleging vindictive prosecution. Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed on the Appointments Clause instead—and the dismissal is without prejudice. The evidence remains. DOJ can re-indict tomorrow. The Dismissal That Wasn’t a Victory On November 24, 2025, Judge Cameron McGowan Currie dismissed the federal indictment against Letitia James. The case is assigned to […]

Judge Currie Dismissed the Indictment—But Not Because the Evidence Was Weak Read More »

, , , , , , Corruption, Crime, Media Playbook

115,000 Pages of “Insufficient Evidence”: Letitia James’s Own Court Filing Destroys the Defense Strategy

/ 14 minutes of reading

Letitia James Claimed “Insufficient Evidence.” Then Her Lawyers Revealed 115,000 Pages of It. In the span of nine days, Letitia James filed her motion to dismiss and four amicus briefs were filed in support, all making the same central claim: experienced career prosecutors reviewed the evidence against New York’s Attorney General and found it insufficient to prosecute. James’s own motion

115,000 Pages of “Insufficient Evidence”: Letitia James’s Own Court Filing Destroys the Defense Strategy Read More »

, , , , , , , Uncategorized

Erik Siebert Had 40 Years of Documentary Evidence. He Chose Not to Prosecute Letitia James.

/ 21 minutes of reading

Four amicus briefs filed in the past week all make the same claim: Career prosecutors found insufficient evidence, and Erik Siebert declined to prosecute Letitia James for mortgage fraud. That claim is provably false. Between February and June 2025, I published independent forensic investigations documenting 40 years of systematic financial fraud in verifiable public records: phantom mortgages that don’t exist

Erik Siebert Had 40 Years of Documentary Evidence. He Chose Not to Prosecute Letitia James. Read More »

, , , , , , , , , Corruption, Crime

The Leak Before the Briefing: An Investigation into DOJ Obstruction in the Letitia James Case

/ 14 minutes of reading

Two DOJ employees disclosed an internal “no probable cause” finding before their supervisor could brief the U.S. Attorney—raising potential violations of DOJ policy and obstruction concerns. WHAT WE FOUND • Two DOJ employees in Norfolk, Virginia leaked their supervisor Elizabeth Yusi’s internal prosecutorial determination to MSNBC • The leak revealed Yusi’s “no probable cause” conclusion about charging New York Attorney

The Leak Before the Briefing: An Investigation into DOJ Obstruction in the Letitia James Case Read More »

, , , , , Corruption, Crime, Media Playbook
Scroll to Top