What do you call a “grassroots revolution” that spends $88,000 on BeyoncĂ©’s tour company, leverages millions in “quiet money” from billionaire-funded organizations, and operates with the same coordination tactics that got Andrew Cuomo penalized by campaign finance regulators? You call it exactly what Zohran Mamdani claims to oppose: a corporate political machine disguised as a movement.
Executive Summary: Key Findings
Bottom Line: Zohran Mamdani’s “grassroots revolution” is a $6.3 million corporate-backed political machine that mirrors the establishment operations he claims to oppose.
🔍 Major Revelations:
- $6.3 Million in Corporate Spending: Despite “grassroots” claims, Mamdani’s $6.3 million in campaign spending includes corporate-level expenditures like $800K on payroll and $88K on AEG Presents (BeyoncĂ©’s tour company), funded by leading all candidates in public matching funds ($7.05M)
- Massive “Quiet Money” Network: Coordination with DSA, Working Families Party, Make the Road, and other well-funded organizations provides millions in undisclosed professional support
- Documented Coordination Violations: Our investigation revealed strategic coordination with Justin Brannan’s campaign involving polls and fundraising that may violate CFB rules
- Double Standard Exposed: While Cuomo lost $1.2M in matching funds for coordination, Mamdani’s similar activities face no scrutiny
⚖️ Legal Issues Identified:
- Potential violations of CFB Rules 1-08(c) and 1-04(g) regarding coordinated expenditures
- Missing in-kind contribution disclosures for organizational support
- Systematic failure to report fair market value of “quiet money” coordination
🎠The Central Deception:
Mamdani operates a sophisticated establishment-level campaign while claiming grassroots authenticity—the exact political performance art he condemns in others. His June 20th CFB petition inadvertently exposes this hypocrisy by acknowledging coordination penalties for opponents while seeking relief for his own well-funded operation.
🔍 Introduction: A Manufactured Underdog, A Familiar Machine
Today, June 20, 2025, Zohran Mamdani—mayoral candidate, self-proclaimed revolutionary, and darling of New York’s progressive left—publicly begged the NYC Campaign Finance Board to lift the spending cap on his campaign. His stated reason, amplified across social media, was the ominous presence of “Andrew Cuomo’s Republican billionaire SuperPAC—the largest in city history.”
Breaking: Mamdani’s Own Words Expose The Hypocrisy
In his formal petition to the CFB today, Mamdani claims his campaign “started from scratch and is at its core a grassroots movement” while simultaneously acknowledging that Cuomo and Fix the City have been penalized for illegal coordination—the exact type of coordination our investigation documented between Mamdani and Brannan campaigns. His petition inadvertently highlights the double standard: penalties for Cuomo’s coordination, none for his own.
It was a familiar message, painted in stark terms of David vs. Goliath. Yet, a forensic examination of Mamdani’s own operation reveals a striking irony: despite their vastly different political brands, Mamdani’s campaign, when peeled back, functions remarkably similarly to the very “corporate political machines” he claims to oppose. This isn’t grassroots; it’s astro-turf, branded in Brooklyn, heavily subsidized by public dollars, and executed with the sophisticated coordination of a top-tier establishment campaign.
Key Finding: This is especially striking given Mamdani’s public rhetoric as a champion of stringent campaign finance reform, often advocating for closing loopholes and limiting the influence of big money in politics. Crucially, this machine is powered not just by direct spending, but by massive, often unquantified “quiet money”—the free resources, strategic expertise, and professional infrastructure provided by well-funded external organizations.
This post takes you on a journey behind the revolutionary curtain, demonstrating how Mamdani’s “revolution” leverages the same structures of power, influence, and professional machinery as his most prominent opponent, Andrew Cuomo.
đź’° Section 1: The Multi-Million Dollar Illusion of Underdog Status
Mamdani’s narrative of a scrappy, underfunded movement is contradicted by the cold, hard numbers. According to the NYC Campaign Finance Board (CFB) records, his campaign has already pulled in a staggering $8,758,911Â in total disbursements as of the latest filing period (covering activity through June 9, 2025).
The $8,758,911 Million Breakdown:
- $1,708,494 million in private contributions, effectively amplified by
- $7,050,417 in public matching funds
This makes Mamdani the top recipient of public matching funds in the mayoral race thus far. He has effectively leveraged the city’s matching funds program, designed for grassroots candidates, into a publicly-funded ATM, converting social media clout into millions from the city treasury. That’s more than many New York families will see in a decade—and it’s coming straight from taxpayers, not plutocrats.
The irony is stark: while Mamdani decries “billionaires,” his primary rival, Andrew Cuomo, also benefits from powerful, well-funded external support. Cuomo’s allied SuperPAC, “Fix the City,” has indeed raised over $10 million, according to early June NY1 reports. Yet, the CFB has already accused Cuomo’s campaign and “Fix the City” of illegal coordination, leading to his campaign being docked more than $1 million in matching funds.
The Double Standard Exposed: In his June 20th CFB petition, Mamdani acknowledges that “the CFB’s judgment of direct coordination between Cuomo for NYC and Fix the City” resulted in penalties, yet his own documented coordination with Brannan’s campaign—including advance knowledge of poll results and strategic fundraising—has faced no scrutiny. Cuomo’s allies were docked over $1.2 million in public match funds for illegal coordination—yet Mamdani, despite comparable structural support, has evaded similar scrutiny while simultaneously petitioning the CFB for relief from spending caps.
🤝 Section 2: Beyond the Candidate – PACs, Partners, and Parallel Playbooks of “Quiet Money”
Mamdani postures as an outsider, but his campaign is tightly integrated into a web of powerful leftist political organizations—each operating its own form of PAC, advocacy wing, or grassroots machine. This mirrors the complex ecosystem of traditional campaigns, albeit with different labels and often, less transparent financial flows and an army of paid professionals.
Legal Definition: Under NYC CFB rules, “in-kind contributions” are broadly defined as “goods or services offered free or at less than the usual charge” or “expenditures made by any person or entity in cooperation, consultation or concert with, or at the request or suggestion of, a candidate’s campaign.” Such contributions must be reported at their fair market value. Yet, the vast, often uncosted support from these allied organizations functions as “quiet money,” providing critical campaign infrastructure, labor, and professional expertise that would cost millions if directly purchased.
The Transparency Gap: Most critically, these “freebies” Mamdani receives are not quantifiable in dollar terms under current disclosure rules, making the true scope of external support nearly impossible for voters to assess. While his $6.3 million in disclosed spending is meticulously documented, the parallel infrastructure of professional staff, strategic coordination, and organizational muscle operating on his behalf remains largely invisible in official filings.
A Broken Disclosure System
This represents a fundamental failure of campaign finance transparency. Voters can see every dollar of Mamdani’s official spending, but the most valuable resources supporting his campaign—the coordinated field operations, professional strategic guidance, and institutional infrastructure—operate in a disclosure blind spot. This isn’t an accident or oversight; it’s a feature of how modern political machines circumvent transparency requirements while maintaining plausible deniability. The result is a system where candidates can claim grassroots authenticity while benefiting from sophisticated establishment-level coordination that would cost millions if purchased directly.
🟥 1. NYC Democratic Socialists of America (DSA)
Mamdani is a card-carrying member and received an early endorsement from NYC-DSA.
The NYC-DSA Political Action Committee (PAC) is registered with the NYC CFB. You can view their independent expenditures on the CFB’s search portal. While their direct financial contributions to Mamdani might be limited, their robust, highly organized field operation—a disciplined, existing force estimated to include hundreds of volunteers—runs parallel to Mamdani’s campaign, knocking doors and driving turnout.
Crucially, this operation is overseen and coordinated by NYC-DSA’s own paid staff and strategic consultants, whose expertise is rarely disclosed as a direct campaign expenditure. When hundreds of pre-trained volunteers hit doors under centralized command, the effect is indistinguishable from a formal field operation—just without the price tag or reporting burden.
đźź© 2. Working Families Party (WFP)
The WFP officially endorsed Mamdani for Mayor in the 2025 primary and actively promotes his campaign across its platforms, including a prominent feature in their 2025 Primary Election Voting Guide.
Unlike informal groups, the WFP is a full-fledged political party with a substantial paid staff and array of consultants (for strategy, polling, communications, and more) at both state and national levels. While their direct expenditures for Mamdani might be modest, the WFP itself is a powerful entity backed by national donors like George Soros’ Open Society Foundations and Susan Sandler’s Hopewell Fund (OpenSecrets profile for WFP).
Bottom Line: If Cuomo has billionaires, Mamdani has a billionaire-funded party.
🟦 3. Make the Road Action / Center for Popular Democracy
Make the Road Action (a 501(c)(4) social welfare organization) endorsed Mamdani, calling him “a movement candidate.”
This organization itself is a major player, operating with significant paid staff, including executive leadership, policy experts, communications teams, and professional organizers, funded by substantial revenue from foundations, government agencies, and unions like the United Steelworkers, Robin Hood Foundation, Ford Foundation, and Rockefeller Brothers Fund (InfluenceWatch profile for Make the Road New York). Their voter outreach operations—staffed and resourced independently—regularly engage in Get-Out-The-Vote (GOTV) pushes that directly benefit endorsed candidates.
🟨 4. New York Communities for Change (NYCC)
The rebranded successor to ACORN, NYCC endorses Mamdani and frequently coordinates issue-based canvassing that mirrors campaign talking points. Like Make the Road, NYCC is heavily funded by organizational contributors, including progressive foundations and major labor unions such as SEIU, Communications Workers of America, and United Federation of Teachers.
The Reality: These groups don’t just support Mamdani—they subsidize him, filling the gaps between ambition and disclosure with staff-funded sweat equity.
🟪 5. “New Yorkers for Lower Costs” PAC
While Mamdani rails against “billionaire SuperPACs,” his campaign is also benefiting from its own version of direct PAC support. This independent expenditure committee, described by JNS.org as the “largest PAC supporting Mamdani,” has received $100,000 from the Council on American-Islamic Relations’ (CAIR) Unity and Justice Fund Super PAC, through a $25,000 contribution on May 30 and a $75,000 gift on June 16, 2025.
PAC Funding Details:
- CAIR’s Unity & Justice Fund: $25K + $75K to ‘New Yorkers for Lower Costs’
- Other donors include: Linda Sarsour and the Truth Project
- CAIR context: A prominent national advocacy organization with significant influence and broad networks
This direct PAC funding, funneled through an intermediary, directly mirrors the ‘billionaire SuperPAC’ model Mamdani decries from his opponent. It may not be called ‘Fix the City,’ but ‘New Yorkers for Lower Costs’ plays the same role—injecting capital through proxies and avoiding fingerprints.
If Cuomo has a traditional SuperPAC, Mamdani has a “SuperOrg” – powered by both its own funds and extensive “quiet money” contributions from organizations with heavy paid staff and consultants – and now, increasingly, direct SuperPAC support. Their functional reliance on outside influence and opaque financial flows, when all intermediaries are peeled away, is remarkably similar.
🎯 Section 3: Professional Production, Not Organic Growth – The Cost of “Grassroots” Aesthetics
Mamdani’s campaign doesn’t just knock on doors—it launches merch, curates viral videos, and floods Instagram with stylized narratives of working-class revolution. This is the playbook of a polished, modern campaign, indistinguishable from any well-funded rival.
The Professional Infrastructure:
- The campaign launched an online store with branded tote bags, stickers, and apparel, a playbook borrowed more from Nike than from neighborhood organizing
- CFB filings show nearly $800K in payroll and a $88,042.78 payment to AEG Presents, a global production firm—hallmarks of an outsourced, establishment-grade campaign
- Over $120K spent on polling, plus documented pre-release coordination with Brannan’s campaign, point to shared strategic resources—not organic grassroots spontaneity
The Corporate Connection: AEG Presents isn’t just any event company—they’re the entertainment industry powerhouse behind some of the world’s biggest productions. The same company that produced BeyoncĂ©’s Renaissance World Tour, coordinates Coachella festival, and manages Madison Square Garden events is now handling staging for a “grassroots” democratic socialist campaign. When your campaign event production is outsourced to the same firm that books global superstars, you’re not organizing a neighborhood movement—you’re mounting a corporate entertainment spectacle.
Note: While a live store link wasn’t immediately found in search, the eBay result for a “Zohran Mamdani for Mayor New York City 2025 Political Campaign Pinback Button” supports the existence of branded merchandise.
Reality Check: Grassroots campaigns don’t typically outsource campaign work to firms that market BeyoncĂ© tours.
High-Profile Media Coordination
Beyond direct advertising, Mamdani’s campaign benefits from an orchestrated digital and media presence that mirrors the outreach of any major political operation. Influencers and digital creators—many affiliated with progressive nonprofits—share campaign content daily, often blurring the line between “supporter” and unofficial surrogate.
Brannan-Mamdani Coordination Evidence:
- Strategic Timeline: Mamdani posted a video on June 9 asking supporters to donate to Brannan’s campaign, just two days before Brannan’s commissioned poll showed Mamdani leading Cuomo for the first time
- Potential CFB Violations: The timing suggests advance knowledge of poll results, potentially violating CFB Rules 1-08(c) and 1-04(g) regarding coordinated expenditures and in-kind contributions
- Methodology Questions: The poll used 61% text responses vs. 39% phone, which “favored Mamdani given his strength with those responding via text”
- Missing Disclosures: No in-kind contributions appear in either campaign’s filings for this coordination
When your campaign needs both a stage manager and a merch team, and secures national late-night TV slots, you’re not organizing a revolution—you’re producing one.
📉 Section 4: The Preemptive Excuse: Deflecting from the Machine
Mamdani’s June 20 plea about “billionaire interference” is more than a funding complaint—it’s a carefully crafted narrative designed to deflect from his own formidable resources. The logic is clear: if Mamdani loses, it won’t be because his well-funded campaign failed to persuade; it will be because the “billionaires” cheated.
This tactic is a page right out of the establishment playbook: control the narrative, cast blame elsewhere. But when you’re the top public fund recipient, endorsed by every major progressive machine in the city, directly benefiting from six-figure PAC funding, and leveraging massive amounts of “quiet money” from powerful, externally funded organizations that employ their own professional staff and consultants, you don’t get to cry foul.
The Bottom Line: Not with $6.3 million in campaign spending, a professionally managed staff, and a vast coordinated network working on your behalf. Such maneuvers reveal a political operator as adept at managing public perception as any seasoned establishment figure. But when you’re spending like the front-runner and framing like the underdog, cries of ‘unfair’ ring hollow.
đź§ Conclusion: Two Sides, One Coin
Zohran Mamdani may brand himself as a revolutionary outsider, but his campaign’s true nature reveals a different story. He doesn’t need a billionaire funder in his personal donor list because he has something arguably more powerful: a publicly funded, PAC-backed (including direct Super PAC support through “New Yorkers for Lower Costs”), influencer-boosted political machine, carefully designed to look like a revolution while running with the sophisticated efficiency of a corporate startup.
This machine is amplified by vast, often unquantified “quiet money”—the free resources, volunteer power, and coordinated efforts of well-funded allied organizations, whose ultimate funding sources are often far removed from the “grassroots,” and who employ their own professional staff and consultants.
When you peel back the layers, the intermediaries, and the “quiet money,” the functional difference between Mamdani’s operation and the very “corporate politics” he condemns becomes strikingly thin. The irony is profound: in his fight against “corporate politics,” Mamdani has built a machine that, in its scale and reliance on powerful, opaque external entities, is functionally indistinguishable from the very system he claims to dismantle.
New York voters deserve better than political performance art. They deserve transparency from candidates who either embrace professional political operations honestly or actually build the grassroots movements they claim to represent. What Mamdani has built isn’t grassroots organizing. It’s Broadway-level political theater, complete with professional production values, coordinated messaging, and a cast of characters playing predetermined roles.
The coordination reveals the actual strategy. The documented timing exposes the calculated coordination. The spending records and the immense value of “quiet money” tell the real story. Behind every revolution is either authentic organizing or professional marketing. The $6.3 million question, amplified by the unseen value of “quiet money,” is: which one is Zohran Mamdani actually selling, and how is it truly different from the status quo he purports to fight?
On June 20, Zohran Mamdani warned us about billionaire-funded political theater. He was right to sound the alarm—just wrong about who’s directing the show.
Written by Sam E. Antar
© 2025 Sam Antar. All rights reserved.